GOODSOUND!GoodSound! "Editorial" Archives

March 1, 2006

 

The Return of the Single and the End of the Album

If you grew up before the 1990s, you probably fondly remember singles -- those 7"-diameter records that featured one song to a side. I still have some embarrassing singles from before I was ten, including at least two by the Village People. The late 1980s and early ’90s saw a flourishing singles scene in indie rock, with some labels, such as Sub Pop, even sponsoring singles clubs, whose members were regularly sent limited-edition singles. This proved a great way to discover new bands -- take $20 to the record store and you could come home with lots of new music by a wide variety of artists. Unfortunately, by the mid-1990s, singles had all but disappeared from most of the record stores I frequented.

Before the CD, a single with two songs on it represented about one-fifth of an album and was priced accordingly. When albums cost $6, I remember buying singles for 99¢. But, by the 1990s, CD prices had come down while their playing times had increased, and the price of a single, whether on LP or CD, had risen so that you were getting less than a fifth of an album for close to half the price. This probably played some role in many labels essentially abandoning singles as a medium. According to a recent Washington Post article, by 2002 singles accounted for less than 7% of record sales.

The decline of singles sales coincided with the first wave of peer-to-peer file sharing. The original Napster always seemed more of a headache than a useful tool, but there was no doubt that it could introduce one to new music. Not only was it cheaper than buying singles (those pesky artists don’t need to get paid, do they?), but downloaders didn’t end up with boxes and boxes of records that needed to be stored.

Now, with the success of Apple’s iPod and iTunes, the single has returned in a new digital format. People no longer need go to their local record store (if they even have one) to get their singles fix; rather, they turn on their computers and find songs to download.

The new digital singles scene can be lucrative for bands, especially those who are relatively unknown. The same Washington Post article describes how the rap group D4L has sold more than 700,000 downloads of their song "Laffy Taffy." Will "Laffy Taffy" have the staying power of the great singles of the 1960s and ’70s? Probably not, but downloading has made it exceptionally easy for people to purchase such songs, enjoy them for a few weeks, and then forget about them. In the past, "Laffy Taffy" might have been a regional hit; now, with digital music services, it can be a global one. Unfortunately, downloads come with none of the romance I associate with my favorite little black discs -- no colorful sleeve, and no need to be physically engaged in playing the singles, as with a turntable.

One thing that I think the success of iTunes and digital singles makes clear is that the days of the album are numbered. iTunes lets its subscribers buy individual songs from nearly any album in an artist’s catalog -- but if those people are happy to download a song here and there from a given band, they won’t be as willing to buy an entire album by that group. iTunes seems to be fostering this new singles culture with their use of celebrity playlists and the iMix feature. Their celebrity playlists offer users the ability to download various celebrities’ lists of their favorite songs. Want to download what Penn Jillette, Ryuichi Sakamoto, or "Weird Al" Yankovic like to hear? While I don’t download music, I’ve been sucked into looking over several of these playlists, and there were some interesting finds. iTunes’ iMix feature allows anyone to construct a playlist on their computer and publish it for others to see -- celebrity playlists for noncelebrities.

There can be no doubt that the primary musical unit on iTunes is the single. If this is the way of the future, then it no longer makes sense for bands to think in terms of albums. They’ll be better served by concentrating on singles, releasing one or two songs every few months instead of an album every year or two. The Washington Post reports that artists receive between 14¢ and 24¢ for each single download, and about $2 for an album sale. The move toward singles may not be as lucrative for artists, but most consumers are sure to be happy with the ability to select just which songs they purchase.

What concerns me, though, isn’t the artists’ financial health, but the decline of the album as an art form. Sure, plenty of albums are just 10 or 15 songs thrown together, but the best are more than the sum of their parts. Consider having "So What" without the rest of Kind of Blue, "God Only Knows" without Pet Sounds, or "Smells Like Teen Spirit" without Nevermind. Each is a great song, but each is even better when taken as a part of its surrounding album.

I wonder if we’ll find that albums were just a temporary delivery method for music. It may well be that soon all music will be just a download away, and all physical storage formats, such as records and CDs, will be relics of the past. One thing that bothers me about this is that it seems that all music could quickly become background music. If users become so divorced from the act of playing music, then music’s role as art may diminish. I think people should be engaged with the music they listen to, and that means taking it seriously. My reason for this is altruistic: I believe that engaging with music, as with the other arts, can make the listener a better person. If music becomes only background noise -- if everything is treated as music for airports -- we’ll all lose out on the emotional and intellectual highs that can come from music.

Two products that can help you reach those highs are the Benchmark DAC1 D/A converter and the ADC1 A/D converter, both of which I review this month. The DAC1 has seen no shortage of favorable reviews, and the time I spent with the ADC1 convinced me that the DAC1’s quality had been no fluke. Benchmark may think of professional audio engineers as their target market, but their gear can be just as rewarding for the diehard music fan.

…Eric D. Hetherington


GOODSOUND!All Contents Copyright © 2006
Schneider Publishing Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Any reproduction of content on
this site without permission is strictly forbidden.